hagrawal at appcomsci.com
Wed Mar 16 13:01:31 PDT 2016
Thanks for your quick response.
My vote is: call_depth is better than inter_function_level, and
max_call_depth is better than call_depth :-).
I assume the call tree depth, in this context, refers to the depth of
the "dynamic" call tree associated with the VFG analysis, and if no
max_call_depth is specified, then no such limit is imposed. Right?
On 3/16/2016 3:06 PM, Fish Wang wrote:
> Hi Hira,
> For CFG, "inter_function_level" has another name called "call_depth".
> Basically it tells the analysis not to trace into a call if it is too deep
> in the call tree, and the depth is specified by this parameter.
> Those two names will be unified later into one, I'm still now sure which one
> is better though.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: angr [mailto:angr-bounces at lists.cs.ucsb.edu] On Behalf Of Hira Agrawal
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 2:23 PM
> To: angr at lists.cs.ucsb.edu
> Subject: [angr] inter-function-level
> I understand what context-sensitivity-level is, but what does
> inter-function-level mean? I know CFG analysis does not care about the
> latter, but VFG analysis does. Is that option/argument explained
> anywhere? I didn't find associated discussion in any of the angr docs.
> Thanks in advance for any help resolving this query.
> -- Hira
> angr mailing list
> angr at lists.cs.ucsb.edu
More information about the angr